HEADLINE: Trumplash: Rapidly Evolving Syria ‘Policy’ Leaves Pundits And Supporters Puzzled

First, the Title says a lot about what is going on…

The second headline is a bit too dishonoring:

It Took A War For Trump To Win CNN’s Approval: “Trump Became President Last Night”

The facts…

-People didn’t show enough support. The statistics simply say, there is a lot of lack of interest in being just and a high interest in supporting greedy activities. The results are clear. If greed continues, more destruction continues, until there is nothing left, including the ones who do bad. What remains after, is a very bad aftermath…

-People, for the most part, at least some of them, are better than before. It is part of the reason, a candidate with a lot of positive support, won the election.

The reality?

-There are a lot of people who are experiencing what is called ‘greed’, in all it’s forms.

-Only when the majority of people, are sick of ‘greed’, in all it’s forms, Justice naturally appears

-Greed disappears only when an individual searches for a thing called “Truth” which will lead in the end to Prudence, Temperance, Determination and Justice, or at least refine those qualities

-The “show” (what everyone perceive through the 5 senses) that is seen in everyone’s lives, may make, at least a small number of people, realize this, and change things, change the narrative into a more balanced one

-Those who lie and do bad generally appear because of some (if not a lot) of people’s quality is partiality and thus they lack the ability to actually do justice to them. As for justice, it can be to fix them, or to suspend their activities. The reality is that there is a continuous work of good that needs to be done and the so called ‘bad guys’, just really like to short themselves. Current reality gets better or worse, depending on the people’s levels of greed, as a whole. The cycle either ends the world with destruction(high amounts of greed) or with purification(greed disappears, the opposite of it, some call it virtue, in all it’s names, but the best name is the Tao). Staying in between is where we are at. Our History showed we only reached higher levels of greed. Only in a period 5000 years ago, a Flood came, to clean up the greed. It’s clear, that high levels of greed only make the world experience Cataclysm.

-As for what Cataclysm is:

  1. 1:  flood, deluge

  2. 2:  catastrophe 3a

  3. 3:  a momentous and violent event marked by overwhelming upheaval and demolition; broadly :  an event that brings great changes an international economic cataclysm

Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cataclysm

Now I leave the contents of the articles(as a record, to show what the articles show):

From this article:


It Took A War For Trump To Win CNN’s Approval: “Trump Became President Last Night”

For CNN, it took a war and pointed, globalist “rhetoric” for Trump to become President of the United States.  Per CNN host Fareed Zakaria on “New Day” this morning:

“I think Donald Trump became president of the United States last night.  I think this was actually a big moment.”


“Candidate Trump had said that he would never get involved in the Syrian civil war.  He told President Obama you can not do this without the authorization of Congress.  He seemed unconcerned with global norms.”


“President Trump recognized that the President of the United States does have to act to enforce international norms, does have to have this broader moral and political purpose.  President Trump realized, as every president has for many decades now, that they have inherent legal authority as commander-in-chief and they don’t have to go to a pesky Congress every time they want military force.”


“For the first time really as president, he talked about international norms, international rules, about America’s role in enforcing justice in the world.  It was the kind of rhetoric that we’ve come to expect from American presidents since Harry Truman, but it was the kind of rhetoric that President Trump had pointedly never used either on the campaign trail nor in his inaugural.”


“So I think there has been an interesting morphing and a kind of education of Donald Trump.”


Of course, CNN’s ‘approval’ will undoubtedly cost Trump a lot of voters…

And from this article:


Trumplash: Rapidly Evolving Syria ‘Policy’ Leaves Pundits And Supporters Puzzled

In the span of just one week, President Trump and his team have pivoted from declaring that Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad could stay in power, to launching airstrikes against his regime—and possibly committing the United States to a new military conflict whose scope and scale are unknown.   

Needless to say, the rapid evolution of Trump’s Syria ‘policy’ has left many pundits and supporters in complete shock, particularly since back in 2013, a relentless Trump blasted our then “very foolish leader” for threats to intervene in Syria, saying that military action would just risk a “worldwide conflict” with “no upside and tremendous downside” for the U.S.


Russia is sending a fleet of ships to the Mediterranean. Obama’s war in Syria has the potential to widen into a worldwide conflict.

President Obama, do not attack Syria. There is no upside and tremendous downside. Save your “powder” for another (and more important) day!

Obama must now start focusing on OUR COUNTRY, jobs, healthcare and all of our many problems. Forget Syria and make America great again!


More recently, just a couple of weeks before the 2016 presidential election, Trump also blasted Hillary’s Syria plan saying the U.S. would “end up in World War III.”  Per Reuters:

On Syria’s civil war, Trump said Clinton could drag the United States into a world war with a more aggressive posture toward resolving the conflict.

Clinton has called for the establishment of a no-fly zone and “safe zones” on the ground to protect non-combatants. Some analysts fear that protecting those zones could bring the United States into direct conflict with Russian fighter jets.

“What we should do is focus on ISIS. We should not be focusing on Syria,” said Trump as he dined on fried eggs and sausage at his Trump National Doral golf resort. “You’re going to end up in World War Three over Syria if we listen to Hillary Clinton.”

“You’re not fighting Syria any more, you’re fighting Syria, Russia and Iran, all right? Russia is a nuclear country, but a country where the nukes work as opposed to other countries that talk,” he said.

Trump said Assad is much stronger now than he was three years ago and said getting Assad to leave power was less important than defeating Islamic State.

“Assad is secondary, to me, to ISIS,” he said.

And, as late as last Thursday, U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley was saying, “Our priority is no longer to sit and focus on getting Assad out,” and Secretary of State Tillerson, borrowing language from Russian diplomats, was announcing, “the longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people.”

All of which, of course, makes yesterday’s decision to bomb an airfield in Syria all that much more puzzling.

“Tonight I ordered a targeted military strike on the airfield in Syria from where the chemical attack was launched,” Trump said in brief remarks at Mar-a-Lago, casting the move as necessary “to prevent and deter the spread and use of deadly chemical weapons.”

And while most of the mainstream media could find a way to criticize Trump for almost anything, the latest decision to bomb Syria seems to be costing him the support of even the most ardent conservative proponents.

I guess Trump wasn’t “Putin’s puppet” after all, he was just another deep state/Neo-Con puppet.

I’m officially OFF the Trump train.

It’s been fun lads, but the fun is over. I’ll be focusing my efforts on Le Pen, who tried to warn Trump against this disaster.

Today over 500,000 people have watched my videos and streams. 90% are @realDonaldTrump supporters, none want war with Syria.

Those who wanted us meddling in the Middle East voted for other candidates.

Trump campaigned on not getting involved in Mideast. Said it always helps our enemies & creates more refugees. Then he saw a picture on TV.


So what say you?  Is this latest controversial decision from Trump just another sign of a White House in complete disarray and lacking any clear foreign policy vision, a desperate attempt to divert attention from some early political failures or was this the plan all along with recent contradictory comments to the press intended solely to maintain the element of surprise?

@walaa_3ssaf No, dopey, I would not go into Syria, but if I did it would be by surprise and not blurted all over the media like fools.

If we are going to continue to be stupid and go into Syria (watch Russia), as they say in the movies, SHOOT FIRST AND TALK LATER!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s