Some ‘rogue’ ‘agencies/employees’ and their ‘no evidence’ stuff

First it was ‘rogue’ EPA or something like that.

First reported in this article:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/trump-bans-epa-employees-using-social-media-bars-new-contracts

Then there were some furious environmentalists:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-25/furious-environmentalists-vow-trump-will-see-wall-resistance-he-never-imagined

Then, some EPA measures:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-25/trump-reportedly-mandates-epa-research-must-undergo-political-review-release

However I advise the reader to look into this:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-10/epa-admits-spilling-millions-gallons-toxic-waste-colorado-river-stunning-aerial-foot
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-12/did-epa-intentionally-poison-animas-river-secure-superfund-money

This is how EPA^ really looks like. It is from august 2015.
And now, they’re ‘protesting’?
And now, someone else added up to this thingy:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2017/01/25/what-the-rogue-epa-nps-and-nasa-twitter-accounts-teach-us-about-the-future-of-social/#2319aa545dc0

First it was EPA. Then it was NPS(didn’t look into it yet) and now NASA? Well apparently it’s not nasa.
Also this article:
https://usuncut.com/resistance/nasa-scientists-join-resistance-rogue-twitter-account/

So they made a twitter acc.
All their tweets sound like this:

“blah blah blah
Carbon emission bigger than 650k years
blah blah blah
Climate Change
blah blah blah
Anti-Trump
blah blah blah
blah blah blah”

No real evidence posted whatsoever. None.
Also, they urge their ‘readers’ to post stuff on ‘ propublica.org ‘.
Nothing useful. Just blatant, ‘resistance propaganda’ with no real facts.
Where are the facts? Where is the information?
Did they even bother to mention ‘free energy stuff’? No.

As a matter of fact, they are looking to be just as bad as the so called ‘epa’ guys that have let an oil spill happen.
It’s like all the so called ‘rogue guys’ are looking to be nothing but blatantly incompetent.

Also, Trump’s projects look great. See this article:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/here-list-donald-trumps-priority-infrastructure-projects

Also, interesting and good article here about the future of NASA:
http://www.universetoday.com/133006/nasa-muzzled-trump-administration/

To quote the whole article:

COULD NASA BE MUZZLED UNDER TRUMP ADMINISTRATION?

Article Updated: 25 Jan , 2017

by

The Trump Administration appears to be trying to change how government agencies disseminate information to the public. According to reports from multiple outlets, several agencies are being told to discontinue or suppress communications with the public, the media and even Congress.

Additionally, Reuters is reporting that the Trump administration has instructed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to remove information about climate change from its website. (An update today from The Hill quotes Doug Ericksen, EPA transition team spokesman as they are only “taking a look at everything on there.”)

All this has anyone interested in NASA’s activities wondering if the US space agency could be ordered to stifle its very active social media presence, or to remove the extensive information it has available on several NASA-related sites on climate change.

Universe Today contacted several NASA sources to see if the space agency has received any orders similar to the other agencies. All indications appear that, for now, NASA has not received any such orders.

John Yembrick, who heads NASA Headquarters’ social media team told us via email that “Nothing has changed here at NASA. We are continuing to share information about our missions on social media.”

Another NASA employee who wished to remain anonymous said they would be surprised and horrified if the social media blocks would extend to NASA but it seems nothing is out of the question now.

This morning, several NASA social media accounts on Twitter and Facebook are posting as usual.

Jeff Foust from Space News reported on Twitter last night that he attended a talk by Michael Freilich, the director of NASA’s Earth science division at the meeting of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) going on this week in Seattle, Washington, and Freilich was asked if NASA been given direction like EPA and other agencies to not communicate with public. Foust tweeted that Freilich said they “have been given no direction to change” and that the transition to the new administration’s “landing team” of about eight people at NASA has gone smoothly.

It is important to remember that federal law has required NASA to widely disseminate information about its activities and scientific research in a timely way. National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 chartered NASA to “provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof.”

The anonymous NASA source Universe Today talked to said the bigger issue for them right now is the hiring freeze that was imposed on all government agencies, and a possible grant freeze, such as the freezes posed on the EPA. Many scientists and graduate student work programs rely on grants for their salaries.

Other agencies that have been reportedly muzzled are the Interior Department (and the National Park Service), the Department of Agriculture (USDA), Department of Commerce, and Health and Human Services. All this is sparking concerns that the new president might be attempting to silence any dissenting views and control any information from federal agencies.

A news article out this morning says the USDA has now “disavowed the gag order”, calling it “flawed” and indicating that new guidance would be sent to its employees.

“This internal email was released without Departmental direction, and prior to Departmental guidance being issued,” the USDA said in a statement.

Is This ‘Normal?’

It’s important to point out that previous incoming presidential administrations have placed somewhat similar restrictions on limiting communications during the transition in order to have consistent messages come out across agencies.

But of course, there hasn’t been a new administration for eight years, and during those years the amount of information government agencies have made available on the internet has increased exponentially, and participation on social media has exploded. So, the moves to limit or silence the information disseminated by the agencies via online outlets is therefore unprecedented.

And many say this presidential transition feels completely different from any before.

National Public Radio (NPR) correspondent Nathan Rott interviewed Andrew Light, Senior Fellow in the Climate Program at the World Resources Institute in Washington, D.C., who formerly worked at the State Department. Light said the muzzling of agencies “seems to be aimed at a cluster of science-driven agencies that primarily work on the environment or climate change, and that seems unique or targeted in this case and unprecedented.”

You can listen to the NPR interview below:

The two highest people in leadership at NASA under the Obama Administration, Administrator Charles Bolden and Deputy Administrator Dava Newman, both stepped down on January 20 at the end of Obama’s term. NASA Associate Administrator Robert Lightfoot was named as acting administrator of NASA. Two White House appointees were named, Erik Noble as White House senior advisor and Greg Autry as White House liaison, part of an eight-member “landing team” assigned to NASA by Trump’s transition team.

Autry is an assistant professor of entrepreneurship at the University of Southern California. He has been “a proponent of commercial space activities,” according to Space News. Noble, who earned a Ph.D. in environmental studies from the University of Colorado, spent seven years at the NASA Goddard Institute of Space Studies in New York, working on weather and climate models.

Concern about agencies being silenced were heightened yesterday when a National Park Service (NPS) Twitter account from the Badlands National Park in South Dakota began posting information about climate change, which were later deleted. The NPS told media outlets that a former employee without approved access wrote the Tweets and that’s why they were deleted.

This came just days after the NPS was told to shut down its Twitter activity over two retweets about crowd sizes at presidential inaugurations. The Department of the Interior said those tweets were deemed inconsistent with the agency’s mission.

About 60 science and journalism organizations have requested a meeting with President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence to discuss access to government, but the newly elected team has not replied to the request.

The Sunlight Foundation, “a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that uses technology, open data, policy analysis and journalism to make our government and politics more accountable and transparent to all,” has posted a list of government agencies that have reportedly been directed to not communicate with the public.

In my opinion, it would be great if some new information could be shared about some things. Like Planet Nine? (Planet IX) (or Planet X)?

It was a video about it here, watched it somewhere around jan 23rd. The video is now down, link is: “youtube.com/watch?v=SFJbUeSZJyY”

It is funny how youtube manages to delete the entire comment section though, after a ‘copyright claim’.

Nevertheless, in the description, it was a link to wikileaks, to an article:

Link to the source: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/447

TELL HILLARY SHE IS WRONG ON CLIMATE CHANGE —— see below

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s