High Taxes ruin lives for every day people. Little to zero tax is best for them! High taxes only for the rich and big corps!

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-04/real-significance-french-tax-revolt

Remember: Usually, taxation can be, and in most cases will be, theft!

When high taxes exist, then wealth is created. That wealth can easily be mismanaged, due to how human nature of most people is greed and laziness. This is why, a lot of taxes, usually, if not always, get misappropriated. In the vast majority of countries of this entire world, it is pretty much the same. Only part of the money taxed gets spent on infrastructure, the rest usually gets into pockets of an already generation of rich people, be it politicians, people running big corporations, and the military-industrial complex.

The only way to solve this issue, is do one, simple, thing!

Keep taxes locally. At least 50%, if not 75% of the money gained through taxes should stay in the local area. And it should always be monitored, where will it go.

And taxes per individual, should be between 0% and 10%. Nothing more. No tax on property. A small tax on profits.

If someone wants to improve the infrastructure, they will have to improve it themselves. Public roads that would be built, should be negotiated with the citizens directly, not with some politician.

People this way need to have public awareness. A politician can only promote, but people should be ones to choose!

This is what is best. If there are low taxes, and a lot less money for the politicians, this will only keep people who truly want to do good things, and not those who are just opportunists that go in politics to make a buck.

Also, another good idea! Small taxes for small businesses! Big taxes for big businesses!

If a firm has 25 employees, it should get a small tax, between 0-10%.

But if a firm has 25-50, make it 10-15%. (Or 10-20%?)

50-100 employees. 15-20%. (Or 20-30%?) (Even better, 20-40%?)

100-200 employees. 20-25%. (Or 30-40%?) (Even better, 40-60%?)

200-400 employees. 25-30%. (Or 40-50%?) (Even better, 60-80%?)

400-800 employees. 30-35%. (Or 50-60%?) (Even better, 80-100%)

800-1600 employees. 35-40%. (Or 60-70%?) (Even better, 100% )

1600-3200 employees. 40-45%. (Or 70-80%?) (Even better, 100% )

3200-6400 employees. 45-50%. (Or 80-90%?) (Even better, 100% )

6400-12800 employees. 50-55%. (Or 90-100%?) (Even better, 100% )

12800-25600 employees, 55-60%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

25600-51200 employees, 60-65%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

51200-102400 employees, 65-70%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

102400-204800 employees, 70-75%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

204800-409600 employees, 75-80%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

409600-819200 employees, 80-85%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

819200-1638400 employees, 85-90%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

1638400-3276800 employees, 90-95%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

3276800-6553600 employees, 95-100%. (Or 100% guaranteed tax on profits?)

6553600+ employees, 100%.

Anything that has over 6553600 employees would be taxed at 100%.

Or is it better, to have a 100% tax on profits at just 12800 employees? Or to have it at just over 800 employees?

The bigger a firm gets in terms of employees, the more it should be taxed.

Now for the article, it clearly says, it taxes the middle class people, but it doesn’t really tax the rich. It should really be opposite.




 

To quote:

Via Alt-Market

Any large and apparently spontaneous activist event can force a measure of change within a system (depending on longevity), but the problem is always how that movement is being directed.  Is it a legitimate grass roots effort, or is there something else at play? 

I am reserving judgement on the “Yellow Jackets” for now, and simply watching.  When they start engaging in public relations regularly, they will present terms, and also probably present their vision of France’s future.  There will also be politicians that attach themselves to the movement if the movement achieves some success, as they seem poised to do.  Then, we will know who is involved, and if the movement is controlled opposition or a real front against centralization. 

Also keep in mind that the globalists may be seeking to give such “populist” movements room to grow, because they plan on collapsing the system anyway and blaming the whole mess on decentralization activists.  I certainly hope this is a win for the people of France, but I would never underestimate the 4th Generation warfare of the establishment.

– Brandon Smith, Founder of Alt-Market.com

This article was written by Peter C. Earle and originally published at AIER.org

The gilets jaunes (Yellow Jacket) anti-tax riots in France escalated over the past weekend, again citing the impact of higher taxes on fossil fuels – and high levels of taxation in general – on everyday life. French citizens, already subject to the highest taxes in the OECD, are being crushed by both new and systematically increasing taxes, and have taken to the streets by the hundreds of thousands in a “citizen’s revolution”. Recommendations to declare a state of emergency have for the time being been tabled.

With no sense of irony whatsoever, in a press conference on Saturday French President Emmanuel Macron stated:

“I will never accept violence.”

Yet violence is the core component of his chosen vocation as a statesman.

Taxation poses as an equitable transaction – goods and services provided by a government in return for a fee (more galling and Orwellian, a “contribution”) from the taxpayer – but the nature of the interaction is obvious to all but the indifferent or determinedly thoughtless. It is not voluntary and does not follow from reason; neither will even the most indefatigable defenders of state appropriation, given the choice (and confidentiality), miss an opportunity to skirt the taxman and retain their property.

The force of violent compulsion is the quintessence of taxation and tax policy, thinly ensconced behind a veil of platitudes regarding social goods and general welfare. In Paris, an oft-repeated phrase among the protesters is that they’re “fed up.” Ambulance drivers have joined the protests, as have both teachers and students in at least 100 schools across France.

Levying taxes on individuals to combat climate change – or for the accomplishment of any social betterment project – is unfailingly undertaken in the name of the sanctity of life. Yet if life is an invaluable state and condition, so too is that of the right of personal property. A life absent the ability to enjoy the products of our toil by utilizing them directly or voluntarily exchanging them with that of others is a life circumscribed, and thus a life forcibly, purposely denigrated in quality.

Media images depicting the tax insurrection are dominated by burning cars, graffiti on the Arc de Triomphe, and clashes with police – despite the fact that the majority of the 136,000 protestors on Saturday were disruptive but peaceful.

Yet none should doubt the long-seething precursor to this conflagration despite the impossibility of capturing winnowed domestic budgets and severe fiscal hardship on film. Furor arising over a life circumscribed by bad luck or adverse conditions is considerable; that which results from unquestionable bureaucratic decrees is ultimately incendiary.

The public reaction to the incremental repression of life’s expression by state coercion at a certain point becomes immediate and visceral. It is playing itself out in the streets of Paris right now.

Consider the larger stakes here. For more than 100 years, European governments have built their invasive states, with the public sector controlling ever more of life. The promise of combining security and prosperity through state enhancement has failed to achieve its promise. And what does the political class propose? More government power, this time in the name of green energy.

At some point, it is too much. Just as the citizens suffering under Soviet rule finally said no more, the people suffering under social-democratic rule might someday do the same. Observers have waited decades to see reforms that might forestall such a thing. Reforms haven’t happened. Now the people are in the streets, setting fires and protesting the police.

And it’s not just France. It’s spreading to Belgium and the Netherlands – the building of a European Spring.

What we see in Paris today might be the end of social democracy as we know it. What comes in its place is what the battle of ideas today is really about.




 

The solution? Small tax for small firms, Big tax for big firms!

Advertisements

Indexes and cryptos could rebound and still stay up until us elections in 2020

Stocks and cryptos could rebound and still stay up until us elections in 2020.

And could also go further ahead, after 2020.

All this is likely possible if Republicans and Trump get their way.

Any type of negative momentum would usually be limited to the big companies and if managed properly, the smaller ones would fill the gap, as opposed to the theory of ‘systemic-risk’. Is what’s best anyways.

Why cryptos? Well they look to reach a bottom and they’re correlated with tech stocks.

When I said ‘risk of 30% crash’, it was to mitigate (make it less than 30%) and warn. While it wouldn’t be a surprise if it would go there( it went 11% lower from it’s highs), it wouldn’t be if it would go up. Issue is big companies that are corrupt will be blessed from the upturn and that wouldn’t do much justice. In crypto the issue can be considered similar. Good tech, but immature players.

Still, lots of people would be happy with a ‘positive’ market, so if Trump doesn’t take credit for ‘downturns’ of corrupt companies, then there will be only credit for ‘upturns’ in the whole stock market.

 

 

No! to implanted chips / rfid. Not in any case. Still, some questions about transhumanism.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-12/one-british-company-wants-implant-microchips-hundreds-thousands-global-workers

Not surprising that it comes from the Brits…

Authored by Michael Snyder via The American Dream blog,

It is really happening.  At one time, the idea that large numbers of people would willingly allow themselves to have microchips implanted into their hands seemed a bit crazy, but now it has become a reality.  Thousands of tech enthusiasts all across Europe have already had microchips implanted, and now a Swedish company is working with very large global employers to implement this on the corporate level.  In fact, Biohax recently told one of the biggest newspapers in the UK that they have been talking with a “major financial services firm” that has  “hundreds of thousands of employees”

Biohax, a Swedish company that provides human chip implants, told the Telegraph it was in talks with a number of UK legal and financial firms to implant staff with the devices.

One prospective client, which cannot be named, is a major financial services firm with “hundreds of thousands of employees.”

For security-obsessed corporations, this sort of technology can appear to have a lot of upside.  If all of your employees are chipped, you will always know where they are, and you will always know who has access to sensitive areas or sensitive information.

According to a top official from Biohax, the procedure to implant a chip takes “about two seconds”, and it is usually implanted in the hand

A syringe is used to place the chip in an area between the thumb and forefinger, according to the report. Osterlund said the procedure is similar to ear piercing and takes “about two seconds.” The microchips operate via “near field communication” technology, similar to what is used by no-contact bank cards.

“In a company with 200,000 employees, you can offer this as an opt-in,” Osterlund told the Telegraph.

Right now, many companies use security badges, and I once worked in a building that required a security badge.

But security badges can be lost, stolen or forged.  Theoretically, microchip implants are much more permanent and much more secure, and that is one of the big selling points.  The following is what the chief medical officer of Biohax recently told Fox News

“The chip implant is a secure way of ensuring that a person’s digital identity is linked to their physical identity. It enables access management in a way that protects individual self-sovereignty and allows users to control the privacy of their online activity,” Dr. Stewart Southey, the Chief Medical Officer at Biohax International, told Fox News.

Of course once this technology starts to be implemented, there will be some workers that will object.

But if it comes down to a choice between getting the implant or losing their jobs, how many workers do you think will choose to become unemployed?

Yes, there will be some that will sacrifice their jobs.  Personally, I will never let anyone put a chip in me.  But just like with so many other things, most of the population will simply choose to accept the “new technology”.

Sadly, the mainstream media is now openly telling us that this is coming.  For example, the following is an excerpt from a recent Fox News article entitled “Are you ready for a chip implant?”

You walk into a grocery store and pick up eggs. No smartphone? No problem. You swipe your hand across a reader, and the amount is deducted from your bank account.

If that sounds far-fetched, you obviously haven’t been to Sweden recently, where thousands of people have reportedlyhad chips implanted in their bodies.

And not too long ago, the NBC affiliate in Tampa profiled a mother that desperately wants to implant a microchip into her disabled child for safety reasons

For Steffany Rodroguez-Neely, life is busier than ever. The Bay Area mother-of-three has her hands full 24-hours a day. The ages of her children run the gamut from newborn to teenager. While this Lutz mom prides herself in being an attentive, active, dedicated mother, she’s also a realist. She knows an emergency can happen in a matter of seconds, even to the best of parents.

When Steffany saw the recent tragedy in Pasco County where a toddler wandered into a pond and drowned, her heart was broken. As she talks about it, she shakes her head sadly, closes her eyes and sighs. “It was awful, so sad. You know, good parents have bad things happen,” Steffany told WFLA.

They always like to use the children to make us feel guilty.

The narrative will be that if you are against implantable microchips then you are against child safety and you are a bad person.  By now, you have seen how this works on issue after issue.  There won’t be any talk about the potential tyranny that government-issued identity microchips could unleash.  Instead, all of the talk will be about the “potential benefits” and about how this will make things so much safer “for the children”.

We truly do live in apocalyptic times, and many of us can see where all of this is leading.  Unfortunately, we can complain all that we want but the agenda just keeps moving forward.

Not too long ago, a Wisconsin-based company called Three Square Market began implanting microchips in their employees “on a voluntary basis”.  In the aftermath of that decision, USA Today published an article entitled “You will get chipped — eventually”.  Here are a few lines from that article…

You will get chipped. It’s just a matter of time.

In the aftermath of a Wisconsin firm embedding microchips in employees last week to ditch company badges and corporate logons, the Internet has entered into full-throated debate.

Can you see the psychological tricks that they are using on us?

They want you to believe that it is inevitable and that everyone around  you will eventually give in and get chipped.

As for me and my house, we will never be chipped under any circumstances.  Everything will be “voluntary” in the beginning, but it doesn’t take a genius to figure out how this story will end.

Here’s my take…

Even if aliens would live among us, I wouldn’t like the microchip idea.

However, if we talk about ‘transhumanism’, how far off are we from this future?

The big question is however, the ‘cloning’ part of yourself^

 

Pardon Julian Assange, he has been through enough!

From this article:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-12/hedges-assange-has-done-more-expose-american-crimes-any-other-news-organization




 

Authored by Chris Hedges via TruthDig.com,

Julian Assange’s sanctuary in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London has been transformed into a little shop of horrors. He has been largely cut off from communicating with the outside world for the last seven months. His Ecuadorian citizenship, granted to him as an asylum seeker, is in the process of being revoked. His health is failing. He is being denied medical care. His efforts for legal redress have been crippled by the gag rules, including Ecuadorian orders that he cannot make public his conditions inside the embassy in fighting revocation of his Ecuadorian citizenship.

Source: Mr.Fish

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison has refused to intercede on behalf of Assange, an Australian citizen, even though the new government in Ecuador, led by Lenín Moreno – who calls Assange an “inherited problem” and an impediment to better relations with Washington – is making the WikiLeaks founder’s life in the embassy unbearable. Almost daily, the embassy is imposing harsher conditions for Assange, including making him pay his medical bills, imposing arcane rules about how he must care for his cat and demanding that he perform a variety of demeaning housekeeping chores.

The Ecuadorians, reluctant to expel Assange after granting him political asylum and granting him citizenship, intend to make his existence so unpleasant he will agree to leave the embassy to be arrested by the British and extradited to the United States. The former president of Ecuador, Rafael Correa, whose government granted the publisher political asylum, describes Assange’s current living conditions as “torture.”

His mother, Christine Assange, said in a recent video appeal,

“Despite Julian being a multi-award-winning journalist, much loved and respected for courageously exposing serious, high-level crimes and corruption in the public interest, he is right now alone, sick, in pain—silenced in solitary confinement, cut off from all contact and being tortured in the heart of London. The modern-day cage of political prisoners is no longer the Tower of London. It’s the Ecuadorian Embassy.”

“Here are the facts,” she went on. “Julian has been detained nearly eight years without charge. That’s right. Without charge. For the past six years, the U.K. government has refused his request for access to basic health needs, fresh air, exercise, sunshine for vitamin D and access to proper dental and medical care. As a result, his health has seriously deteriorated. His examining doctors warned his detention conditions are life-threatening. A slow and cruel assassination is taking place before our very eyes in the embassy in London.”

“In 2016, after an in-depth investigation, the United Nations ruled that Julian’s legal and human rights have been violated on multiple occasions,” she said. “He’d been illegally detained since 2010. And they ordered his immediate release, safe passage and compensation. The U.K. government refused to abide by the U.N.’s decision. The U.S. government has made Julian’s arrest a priority. They want to get around a U.S. journalist’s protection under the First Amendment by charging him with espionage. They will stop at nothing to do it.”

“As a result of the U.S. bearing down on Ecuador, his asylum is now under immediate threat,” she said. “The U.S. pressure on Ecuador’s new president resulted in Julian being placed in a strict and severe solitary confinement for the last seven months, deprived of any contact with his family and friends. Only his lawyers could see him. Two weeks ago, things became substantially worse. The former president of Ecuador, Rafael Correa, who rightfully gave Julian political asylum from U.S. threats against his life and liberty, publicly warned when U.S. Vice President Mike Pence recently visited Ecuador a deal was done to hand Julian over to the U.S. He stated that because of the political costs of expelling Julian from their embassy was too high, the plan was to break him down mentally.A new, impossible, inhumane protocol was implemented at the embassy to torture him to such a point that he would break and be forced to leave.”

Assange was once feted and courted by some of the largest media organizations in the world, including The New York Times and The Guardian, for the information he possessed. But once his trove of material documenting U.S. war crimes, much of it provided by Chelsea Manning, was published by these media outlets he was pushed aside and demonized. A leaked Pentagon document prepared by the Cyber Counterintelligence Assessments Branchdated March 8, 2008, exposed a black propaganda campaign to discredit WikiLeaks and Assange.

The document said the smear campaign should seek to destroy the “feeling of trust” that is WikiLeaks’ “center of gravity” and blacken Assange’s reputation. It largely has worked. Assange is especially vilified for publishing 70,000 hacked emails belonging to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and senior Democratic officials. The Democrats and former FBI Director James Comey say the emails were copied from the accounts of John Podesta, Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, by Russian government hackers. Comey has said the messages were probably delivered to WikiLeaks by an intermediary. Assange has said the emails were not provided by “state actors.”

The Democratic Party – seeking to blame its election defeat on Russian “interference” rather than the grotesque income inequality, the betrayal of the working class, the loss of civil liberties, the deindustrialization and the corporate coup d’état that the party helped orchestrate – attacks Assange as a traitor, although he is not a U.S. citizen. Nor is he a spy. He is not bound by any law I am aware of to keep U.S. government secrets. He has not committed a crime. Now, stories in newspapers that once published material from WikiLeaks focus on his allegedly slovenly behavior—not evident during my visits with him—and how he is, in the words of The Guardian, “an unwelcome guest” in the embassy. The vital issue of the rights of a publisher and a free press is ignored in favor of snarky character assassination.

Assange was granted asylum in the embassy in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden to answer questions about sexual offense charges that were eventually dropped. Assange feared that once he was in Swedish custody he would be extradited to the United States. The British government has said that, although he is no longer wanted for questioning in Sweden, Assange will be arrested and jailed for breaching his bail conditions if he leaves the embassy.

WikiLeaks and Assange have done more to expose the dark machinations and crimes of the American Empire than any other news organization. Assange, in addition to exposing atrocities and crimes committed by the United States military in our endless wars and revealing the inner workings of the Clinton campaign, made public the hacking tools used by the CIA and the National Security Agency, their surveillance programs and their interference in foreign elections, including in the French elections. He disclosed the conspiracyagainst British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn by Labour members of Parliament. And WikiLeaks worked swiftly to save Edward Snowden, who exposed the wholesale surveillance of the American public by the government, from extradition to the United States by helping him flee from Hong Kong to Moscow. The Snowden leaks also revealed, ominously, that Assange was on a U.S. “manhunt target list.”

What is happening to Assange should terrify the press. And yet his plight is met with indifference and  sneering contempt. Once he is pushed out of the embassy, he will be put on trial in the United States for what he published. This will set a new and dangerous legal precedent that the Trump administration and future administrations will employ against other publishers, including those who are part of the mob trying to lynch Assange. The silence about the treatment of Assange is not only a betrayal of him but a betrayal of the freedom of the press itself. We will pay dearly for this complicity.

Even if the Russians provided the Podesta emails to Assange, he should have published them. I would have. They exposed practices of the Clinton political machine that she and the Democratic leadership sought to hide. In the two decades I worked overseas as a foreign correspondent I was routinely leaked stolen documents by organizations and governments. My only concern was whether the documents were forged or genuine. If they were genuine, I published them. Those who leaked material to me included the rebels of the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN); the Salvadoran army, which once gave me blood-smeared FMLN documents found after an ambush; the Sandinista government of Nicaragua; the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Central Intelligence Agency; the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) rebel group; the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO); the French intelligence service, Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure, or DGSE; and the Serbian government of Slobodan Milosovic, who was later tried as a war criminal.

We learned from the emails published by WikiLeaks that the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, two of the major funders of Islamic State.

As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton paid her donors back by approving $80 billion in weapons sales to Saudi Arabia, enabling the kingdom to carry out a devastating war in Yemen that has triggered a humanitarian crisis, including widespread food shortages and a cholera epidemic, and left close to 60,000 dead. We learned Clinton was paid $675,000 for speaking at Goldman Sachs, a sum so massive it can only be described as a bribe. We learned Clinton told the financial elites in her lucrative talks that she wanted “open trade and open borders” and believed Wall Street executives were best-positioned to manage the economy, a statement that directly contradicted her campaign promises. We learned the Clinton campaign worked to influence the Republican primaries to ensure that Donald Trump was the Republican nominee. We learned Clinton obtained advance information on primary-debate questions. We learned, because 1,700 of the 33,000 emails came from Hillary Clinton, she was the primary architect of the war in Libya. We learned she believed that the overthrow of Moammar Gadhafi would burnish her credentials as a presidential candidate. The war she sought has left Libya in chaos, seen the rise to power of radical jihadists in what is now a failed state, triggered a massive exodus of migrants to Europe, seen Libyan weapon stockpiles seized by rogue militias and Islamic radicals throughout the region, and resulted in 40,000 dead. Should this information have remained hidden from the American public? You can argue yes, but you can’t then call yourself a journalist.

“They are setting my son up to give them an excuse to hand him over to the U.S., where he would face a show trial,” Christine Assange warned.

“Over the past eight years, he has had no proper legal process. It has been unfair at every single turn with much perversion of justice. There is no reason to consider that this would change in the future. The U.S. WikiLeaks grand jury, producing the extradition warrant, was held in secret by four prosecutors but no defense and no judge. The U.K.-U.S. extradition treaty allows for the U.K. to extradite Julian to the U.S. without a proper basic case. Once in the U.S., the National Defense Authorization Act allows for indefinite detention without trial. Julian could very well be held in Guantanamo Bay and tortured, sentenced to 45 years in a maximum-security prison, or face the death penalty. My son is in critical danger because of a brutal, political persecution by the bullies in power whose crimes and corruption he had courageously exposed when he was editor in chief of WikiLeaks.”

Assange is on his own. Each day is more difficult for him. This is by design. It is up to us to protest. We are his last hope, and the last hope, I fear, for a free press.

“We need to make our protest against this brutality deafening,” his mother said.

“I call on all you journalists to stand up now because he’s your colleague and you are next. I call on all you politicians who say you entered politics to serve the people to stand up now. I call on all you activists who support human rights, refugees, the environment, and are against war, to stand up now because WikiLeaks has served the causes that you spoke for and Julian is now suffering for it alongside of you. I call on all citizens who value freedom, democracy and a fair legal process to put aside your political differences and unite, stand up now. Most of us don’t have the courage of our whistleblowers or journalists like Julian Assange who publish them, so that we may be informed and warned about the abuses of power.”




 

No version is surprising: “KGB Defector predicts 34 years ago, Modern USA” and “RV researcher searching humanity’s origin”

I’ll just leave these links and articles below:




https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica2/sociopol_americanempire310.htm

by Paul Ratner
July 18, 2018
from BigThink Website
A disturbing interview
given by a KGB defector in 1984
describes (North) America of today
and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing
used by the KGB. 

Bezmenov described this process as “a great brainwashing” which has four basic stages.

  • The first stage is called “demoralization” which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.

  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.

President Trump was almost universally panned for the press conference that followed the meeting with Russia’s President Putin in Helsinki, Finland.
Trump was seen as capitulating to Russia by refusing to confront Putin on the issue of past and present interference in American elections. In fact, the American president seemed to be saying he doesn’t support thefindings of his own intelligence agencies and instead prefers to take the Russian leader at his word.
Even if he’s changed his tune under the backlash.

Whether you believe Putin really has some kind of compromising material to make Trump do his bidding or if Trump is simply being nice to people who partially helped get him elected, or if you somehow still think, despite ample evidence to the contrary, that all this is much ado about nothing, the fact is President Putin is a very experienced former KGB officer.

He has both the know-how and the intelligence to carry out very far-sighted and ingenious operations.
We don’t know his endgame and neither do we know how much of his KGB training he still employs, but in light of current events, there may be a way for us to get a deeper understanding by studying the words of Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov, a former KGB agent who defected to Canada in 1970.

In 1984, Bezmenov gave an interview to G. Edward Griffin from which much can be learned today.

His most chilling point was that there’s a long-term plan put in play by Russia to defeat America through psychological warfare and “demoralization”.
It’s a long game that takes decades to achieve but it may already be bearing fruit.

Bezmenov made the point that the work of the KGB mainly does not involve espionage, despite what our popular culture may tell us.

Most of the work, 85% of it, was,

“a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare.”

What does that mean?
Bezmenov explained that the most striking thing about ideological subversion is that it happens in the open as a legitimate process.

“You can see it with your own eyes,” he said.

The American media would be able to see it, if it just focused on it.

Here’s how he further defined ideological subversion:

“What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”

Bezmenov described this process as “a great brainwashing” which has four basic stages.

1  The first stage is called “demoralization” which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.

According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.

In other words, the time it takes to change what the people are thinking.

He used the examples of 1960s hippies coming to positions of power in the ’80s in the government and businesses of America. Bezmenov claimed this generation was already “contaminated” by Marxist-Leninist values.

Of course, this claim that many baby boomers are somehow espousing KGB-tainted ideas is hard to believe but Bezmenov’s larger point addressed why people who have been gradually “demoralized” are unable to understand that this has happened to them.

Referring to such people, Bezmenov said:

“They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern [alluding to Pavlov]. You can not change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information.

Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior.”

Demoralization is a process that is “irreversible”.

Bezmenov actually thought (back in 1984) that the process of demoralizing America was already completed.

It would take another generation and another couple of decades to get the people to think differently and return to their patriotic American values, claimed the agent.

Vladimir Putin

in a KGB uniform around 1980

In what is perhaps a most striking passage in the interview, here’s how Bezmenov described the state of a “demoralized” person:

“As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore,” said Bezmenov.

“A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures; even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him [a] concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it, until he [receives] a kick in his fan-bottom.

When a military boot crashes his balls then he will understand. But not before that. That’s the [tragedy] of the situation of demoralization.”

It’s hard not to see in that the state of many modern Americans. We have become a society of polarized tribes, with some people flat out rejecting facts in favor of narratives and opinions.

2   Once demoralization is completedthe second stage of ideological brainwashing is “destabilization”.

During this two-to-five-year period, asserted Bezmenov, what matters is the targeting of essential structural elements of a nation:

  • economy

  • foreign relations

  • defense systems

Basically, the subverter (Russia) would look to destabilize every one of those areas in the United States, considerably weakening it.

3   The third stage would be “crisis”.

It would take only up to six weeks to send a country into crisis, explained Bezmenov.

The crisis would bring,

“a violent change of power, structure, and economy” and will be followed by the last stage, “normalization.”

That’s when your country is basically taken over, living under a new ideology and reality.

This will happen to America unless it gets rid of people who will bring it to a crisis, warned Bezmenov.

What’s more,

“if people will fail to grasp the impending danger of that development, nothing ever can help [the] United States,” adding.

“You may kiss goodbye to your freedom.”

It bears saying that when he made this statement, he was warning about ‘baby boomers’ and ‘Democrats’ of the time.

In another, somewhat terrifying excerpt, here’s what Bezmenov had to say about what is really happening in the United States. It may think it is living in peace, but it has been actively at war with Russia.

And for some time:

“Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system trains another generation of people who think they are living at the peacetime,” said the former KGB agent.

“False. United States is in a state of war: undeclared, total war against the basic principles and foundations of this system.”

Whether you think that is true may depend on your politics, but the reality of Russian active measures, as has been outlined in the recent indictments by the special counselor Robert Mueller, give Bezmenov’s words new urgency.

You can watch the full interview here:

 



 

From this article:




https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vision_remota/esp_visionremota_48.htm


by Arjun Walia
October 29, 2018
from Collective-Evolution Website
Spanish version
Artwork by Kenny Callicutt

In Brief

The Facts:
Joseph Mcmoneagle, one of the most successful US Army-trained remote viewers, peered into the past to look into the possible origins of human history. He saw that we were created by intelligent beings in what he called a ‘laboratory.’

Reflect On:
Why is the mainstream story of human history still limited to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution? Why have so many discoveries, like giants, and life on other planets, been completely concealed and brushed off as a ‘conspiracy theory’?

The true origins of human history remain a mystery, but that’s not what mainstream academia would have us believe.
Since Darwin, human evolution and ‘the survival of the fittest’ has been pushed on the population as some sort of scientific truth, despite the fact that it remains a theory with multiple loopholes and ‘missing links.’
If you question it, in some circumstances, you are almost considered a nut.

This continues to happen in many different fields of knowledge; when you question beliefs that have been ingrained for so long you get a harsh response, and in some cases, you’re liable to be fined, put in jail or at the very least you receive tremendous amounts of hate and censorship.

What we don’t hear about is the fact that there are several hundred scientists, if not several thousand, who have spoken up against the scientific validity of the theory of evolution to reject Darwin‘s theory of evolution and explain why it’s not really valid at all.

Our DNA Originated Somewhere Else

Even one of the founding fathers of DNA, Francis Crick, believed that human DNA must have originated from somewhere else in the galaxy, whereby,

“organisms were deliberately transmitted to earth by intelligent beings on another planet.”

You can read more about that at “Nobel Prize Winning Co-Discoverer of DNA Says our Genes were Brought here by Extraterrestrials“.
Recently it was written a paper that was published by 33 scientists in the Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology Journal suggesting that the flourishing life during the Cambrian era (Cambrian Explosion) originated from the stars.

“With the rapidly increasing number of exoplanets that have been discovered in the habitable zones of long-lived red dwarf stars (Gillon et al., 2016), the prospects for genetic exchanges between life-bearing Earth-like planets cannot be ignored.”

Source

There is a great little blurb from Cosmos Magazine, one of the few outlets who is talking about the study.

Serious inquiry into the origins of human history are not encouraged in the mainstream. Yet as we dig a little on what’s being done, there is a lot to find out, with new theories and discoveries that seem to be popping up every single year.

Modern day education is hardly keeping up with this, and in fact continues to promulgate old theories and notions that have long been disproven.
As a result, nobody beyond ardent self-motivated researchers are learning about new developments or have any knowledge of these viewpoints.
Opening Our Minds

The suppression of the discoveries of giant humanoid skeletons falls directly into this category, though the secrecy that wraps up the Smithsonian is a topic for another article.
Suffice it to say that successful cover-ups of information are possible in part due to the phenomenon of ‘cognitive dissonance’, which speaks to the extreme discomfort that a piece of information that disrupts the worldview you grew up with can have on you.
Many of us have and do experience this, including myself. In today’s day and age, it’s important to practice overcoming the discomfort to keep an open mind.

Consider entertaining new ideas without necessarily accepting them, just give them a chance to swirl in your mind a bit. With new information constantly emerging at a rapid pace in all fields, an open mind is what serves us best.

If we stay closed and refuse to even look at or acknowledge evidence that contradicts what we believe, we will never advance towards actual truth, and simply be caught up in an agnostic state while never really getting to the bottom of the questions that are naturally on our mind.

The StarGate Program

The StarGate program was co-founded by Russell Targ (watch his banned TED talk about ESP), Hal Puthoff, who is now a member of the ‘To The Stars Academy’ with Tom Delonge, and other notable names who have worked on Deep Black Budget programs within the U.S. government.
They are currently spearheading an effort to let the American public know that UFOs are real and that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that, as Louis Elizondo says,

“we are not alone, whatever that means.”

The StarGate program investigated parapsychological phenomenon like remote viewing, telepathy, telekinesis, and clairvoyance.
The program yielded high statistically significant results and was used multiple times for intelligence gathering purposes. A lot of interesting information came out of the literature that was declassified in 1995 after the program ran for more than two decades.

It was a complete mystery why the program was shut down: remote viewing, for example, which is the ability to describe the physical characteristics at a given location irrespective of distance, was found to be repeatable, even more than findings in the hard sciences, with a success rate of over 80 percent.

Remote viewing was how the rings around Jupiter were actually discovered by Ingo Swann before NASA was able to measure them.

“To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon.

Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise…

The development of this capability at SRI has evolved to the point where visiting CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled laboratory conditions.”

Source


The Breadth of Remote Viewing

There are examples in the literature, from remote viewers looking at classified Russian technology during the cold-war era, locating a lost spy plane in Africa and the prediction of future events.
Yes, along with remote viewing comes the ability to view into the past, and view into the future.
Obviously, this gets tricky, especially if we look at quantum physics, which works in tandem with parapsychology. In quantum physics, experiments have also shown how what happened in the past can change the future, and what happens in the future can change the past, on a quantum scale.
You can read more about that here.

There were multiple people working within the Remote Viewing Program, which was conducted at Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in conjunction with multiple intelligence agencies, and one of them was Joseph Mcmoneagle.

Many of these people, after decades in the program, continued on with their research and experimentation long after the program was declassified.
Joseph was one of the most successful Army-trained remote viewers, and one of the original members of project Stargate.
He was actually awarded the Legion of Merit for,

“producing crucial and vital intelligence unavailable from any other source” to the intelligence community.


The Origins of Humanity

In 1983, McMoneagle worked with Robert A. Monroe, founder of the Monroe Institute in Faber, Virginia, which provided basic out-of-body orientation for many of the military remote viewers.
There, he conducted a session seeking to discover the origin of humanity.
As the late great author and researcher Jim Marrs points out in his best selling book Our Occulted History points out:

During the 129-minute session, he described a shoreline on what appeared to him to be a primitive Earth. He later estimated a time of about thirty million to fifty million years after the time of the dinosaurs.

Cavorting on this shoreline was a large family of protohumans-hairy animals about four feet in height, walking upright and possessing eyes exhibiting a spark of intelligence despite a somewhat smaller cranial capacity.

Two things surprised McMoneagle in this session. These creatures appeared to be aware of his psychic presence, and they did not originate at that location.

McMoneagle described his experience in his 1998 book, The Ultimate Time Machine:

This particular species of animal is put… specifically in that barrier place… called the meeting of the land and the sea…

I also get the impression that they’re… ah… they were put there. They mysteriously appeared. They are not descended from an earlier species, they were put there (by a) seed ship… no, that’s not right.

Keep wanting to say ship, but it’s not a ship. I keep seeing a… myself… I keep seeing… oh, hell, for lack of a better word, let’s call it a laboratory, where they are actually inventing these creatures.

They are actually constructing animals from genes.

Why would they be doing that? Can we do this yet… here and now? Like cutting up genes and then pasting them back together. You know, sort of like splicing plants… or grafting them, one to another…

Interesting, it’s like they are building eggs by injecting stuff into them with a mixture of DNA or gene parts of pieces.

He described these creatures as delicate-looking aquiline-featured humanoids, unclothed, in possession of a prehensile tail and large “doe-like” eyes.
They seemed to be using some sort of light that McMoneagle had a hard time describing, but eventually described it as a “grow light.”

Marrs got the impression that it was like someone tending to a garden, and planting seeds, but,

“there isn’t any concern about the seeds after they are planted…

It’s simply like…well… put these seeds here and on to better and bigger business. No concern about backtracking and checking on the condition of the seeds.

They can live or die, survive or perish.”

The session ended with him moving closer in time and perceiving these beings growing in size and ability, eventually becoming herding humans.

The surveillance of and interference with humanity is documented in the lore of almost all civilizations that have roamed the planet.

Although some have called this mere ‘interpretation,’ it reminds me of people referring to the confirmation of spiritual and metaphysical realms as a result of quantum physics.
It is simply labeled as an interpretation due to the fact that it upsets so many belief systems and long-held preconceived ideas.

The Takeaway

The story of human history has a lot of holes.

From the UFO extraterrestrial phenomena to the discovery of strange skeletal remains, to the rejection of Darwinism all the way to the existence of intelligence ancient civilizations like Atlantis, and others that thrived possibly millions of years ago, we are like, as author Graham Hancock coined,

a species with amnesia…

But perhaps we are starting to remember.
Perhaps our only two explanations are incorrect, or perhaps they’re both correct, combined with other factors.
The point is, what we’ve been told is not true, and the recognition of that fact will lead us on the path towards true discovery, and away from the concealment and manipulation of information and truth.

I’m not saying this is how humans are created,

perhaps it is just some sort of glimpse into something much bigger that took place billions of years ago?




 

Conclusion?

“USA”, ‘done’ via covert operations by soviets? Humans created by aliens? Fits ‘Terra Papers’ narrative, “Wes Penre papers” narrative. In a way, some would say ‘Garden of Eden’ would look like a ‘Laboratory’ too. After all, doesn’t a ‘Garden of Eden’ fit the Laboratory description?

Some say ‘german nazis’ migrated to Antarctica due to better conditions there to do whatever tech they wanted, and didn’t care anymore about the german people. Wouldn’t be surprised if ‘soviets’ thought the same about their ‘russian counterparts’ and just migrated in countries like Canada and USA, taking over, and then, just ‘blaming russia’ because different russians took control. Whatever it is, these are just assumptions.

More curious, would be, what if all these ‘narratives’ are a distraction? Like ‘Look, squirrel!’

Still, ‘Secret Space program’, ‘Antarctica’, ‘Underground bases’, classified sites like ‘area51’ and other things do come to mind, that can’t be brushed off easily.

 

‘Democrats’ doing vote cheating…

From this article:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-08/republican-victories-florida-headed-recount-suspicions-about-possible-vote

‘Democrats’ claim they lost the vote, while in reality…

Let’s just quote this comment:

“Democrats “finding” boxes of votes after a clean up. Oh yeah. Sounds legitimate.”
this is exactly what happened about 10 years ago in Washington state.
The republican won the gubernatorial election by over 2,000 votes.
The democrats demanded a recount and magically couple of trays with votes, that were previously missed, were found in Seattle elections office. 
The democrat still lost on the recount.
They demanded another recound, and again, more trays with ballots were found in Seattle. 
If I remember correctly that was still not enough and a 3rd recound was done, which was won by the democrat. 
It was so obvious that the whole thing was fraudulent. 
Of course then almost the same method was used in Minnesota to get Al Franken elected to the senate.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-08/republican-victories-florida-headed-recount-suspicions-about-possible-vote?commentId=59de4acb-8f95-4cac-b677-7d43981e0901

 

This gives me hope.

https://savetheworld1001.wordpress.com/2018/11/07/abusive-left/
I’ll just say abusive left. Nazis and Commies are a Leftist party. Buddhism is the true equivalent of right wing.

Trump does the best he can. It is what it is. However we need to get better. That is all.

I know the whole ‘building’ the stuff in 2 years. But I guess it’s very hard to defeat something in 2 years, that was built by the opposite side in more than 20 years.

If one takes into account honest math, it would take around 20 years to undo all the bad stuff that the ‘left’, and the ‘globalists’ did for the past 20 years. This is some realistic expectation.

I just dislike what the previous paragraph says, but it might be true.

It will take a whole lifetime, a generation(20 years), to repair the damage that was inflicted by the current left. If anyone wants to have a great world, they will have to fight it their whole lives.

We all have dreams of building great endeavors(business, firm), possibly going to space, achieving world peace, having all the ‘bad’ guys to receive the proper punishment and for some rehabilitation, solving all countries conflicts and uniting all minds on one good common goal.

Though these goals will, at current pace, take tens of years to develop. The only alternative is to change the pace. And that’s up to each of us.

https://lovetruthsite.wordpress.com/2018/11/07/mid-term-report-card-a-shot-across-the-bow-for-republicans-and-donald-trump/comment-page-1/#comment-7529

I think this is just the beginning. Just 2 years. 2 more to go, and extra 20 years afterwards.